Husqvarna 338XPT's big brother

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Irradicable

ArboristSite Lurker
Joined
Sep 26, 2002
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Location
Below I20, Georgia
I saw a climbers saw like the Husqvarna 338XPT that was larger than 39.0 cm³ on the net and now I can't find it. It was just over 40.0 cm³, like 42 or 43. Something about being from california.?
Anyone know what it was?
Thanks for the help,
Dave
 
Sounds like a saw Bailey's would sell. They are a sponsor here. They have a forum here and a link at the top of the page.
 
That's it!

That's it!
Built on the same design as the popular 335XP California Special, the 338XP "Cali" has a larger displacement engine (45cc verses the 38cc found on standard 338XP saws purchased at most Husky dealers in the U.S.)

So why the extra displacement? Is it to make up for the extra spark arrest and detuning to meet the california codes?

Thanks,
Dave
 
you guys keep in mind a 338 isnt much difrent powerwise from an echo it is just about a 140.00 bucks more.
 
Originally posted by Irradicable
So... given the choice would you buy the 338XPT or the 338XPC?

Neither. Top handle saws are for tree climbing sissies.:D ;)


Ditto what Brian said about the 346xp, I'm getting another one this week.
 
New Federal 2005 standards will kick in soon.

California Air Resource Board (CARB) had reared it's head last year with a new Tier III set of standards on Permeations & Evaporation that is estimated to cost the engine makers of engines for OPE & Construction industries about one billion dollars ($1,000,000,000.00).

Thank goodness the "Terminator Govenor" who isn't a 'girlie man'.......put a hold on them going into effect till a more complete study was done.

Some engine 'displacement bumps' will be because makers know: 1. People buy SIZE. Whether it works better or not.
2. Emission ratings, and points "banked" for 'clean' engines vs points deducted for 'dirty' engines is very complicated, convoluted set up. Don't envy them one bit.

We will see more of the 'displacement bumps' because they can sell more of the larger engines that are a little cleaner, but won't meet, or they won't have the more stringent EDP ratings of: Class 'A', Extended, or 300 hours (all mean the same thing).

Manufacturers that are behind in R & D on clean engine development, and or production of them will benefit from this.
Helps to somewhat level the playing field on unit sales, because they will not having to spend the $$$$ for pure R & D, and product development other companies have.
Kind of like riding the other guys shirt tails.

'Displacement bumps', four cycles, and the increased usage of catalytic mufflers will be greatly increased, which add extra costs, reduce operating performance, and component life.
Many of the companies are literally speaking out of both sides of their mouth.

Three come to mind:
One super big one is pushing a hybrid four stroke, while quietly buying rights on a two stroker from another company who couldn't get it to work.
Another is pushing a two stroke, that will need a catalytic muffler (already in Calif), and is quietly trying to develop a four banger.
The last 'big dog', will be introducing a retarded version of an "air head" or better described as a 'stratofied air induction' design that was Federally certified in 1995. But it probably just gets them around the patents, but it's still crude, and heavier.

Because of the regulations.....we ALL are somewhat stuck with some of our future choices by some companies, and some other companies that are small,....but....offer equal to or better design, and quality of some of the giants will struggle to get their products out due to having fewer dealers.

Caveat Emptor...."Let the buyer beware" is certainly true for this industry and it's spin.
 
Back
Top