Hedgerow
HACK
Mike, I need to send you a 7900 just
To run for a week...
I like an old school 044 and a 7900..
You may too....
Or not...
But ya never know..
Poll: What is the saw to have in the 70-80cc range?
- Thread starter bryanr2
- Start date
Help Support Arborist Forum:
To run for a week...
I like an old school 044 and a 7900..
You may too....
Or not...
But ya never know..
treeslayer2003
Addicted to ArboristSite
i really have thought about a dolmar but in 90cc..........i just don't like springs.
I could be wrong, but I would like to test my 044 against a stock 7900, and my ported 046 against a ported 7900.
Win or loose, it would be fun. Maybe at the next GTG.
Win or loose, it would be fun. Maybe at the next GTG.
I think they are Pro Safety... I got them from Bailey's, if I remember correctly. I absolutely hate the way the stock ones look.
nmurph
ArboristSite.com Sponsor
Mike, a 7900 will kick the living dog squeeze out of an 044 in either configuration, and I like an 044.
KenJax Tree
Terraphobic
Not his
nmurph
ArboristSite.com Sponsor
Uh, OK.
KenJax Tree
Terraphobic
[emoji1] you missed the sarcasm didn't you? Maybe not...
Hedgerow
HACK
7900 FTW!!!
What's a DullMar?
Trx250r180
Saw polisher
Oh yeah ??
Can you say noodle saw for ripping maple blocks ?,with the 8 pin you do not want to be within 20 feet of the back of this saw
Chris, I did not say the 044 would win, but I said I would like to give it a go.
And for the record I said ported 046. I know the 7900 still has a size advantage, but I think it would be fun.
Chris, if I said my saws were better, and then was not willing to "walk the walk", your comments would have some merit, but that is not what I said, and your comments don't have any merit. Competition can be fun even if you don't win.
7900s are strong runners, and have a size advantage, but I still think it would be fun, nothing wrong with that.
And for the record I said ported 046. I know the 7900 still has a size advantage, but I think it would be fun.
Chris, if I said my saws were better, and then was not willing to "walk the walk", your comments would have some merit, but that is not what I said, and your comments don't have any merit. Competition can be fun even if you don't win.
7900s are strong runners, and have a size advantage, but I still think it would be fun, nothing wrong with that.
CapitaineHaddoc
European Westcoaster
This one is probably the most impressive 7900 I have see. But I don't want to run mine @ 16.500rpm
Nice Capitaine, very impressive!
044 and 7900 are in different leagues.
HuskStihl
Chairin'em for the sound
If the "7900" is at advertised size, a 390 is closer in cc's to it than an 044
CapitaineHaddoc
European Westcoaster
That's true, but the 7900 is just an alien. Weight of a 70cc saw, power close to a 90cc saw.
SawTroll
Information Collector
The original 372xp was 2.0/3.1 at WOT in wood, 3.1/4.0 at WOT out of wood, according to the DLG test report.
Factory specs was 3.5/4.0, but likely included some time at idle, which always (?) drives the numbers up.
Corresponding numbers for the 7900 were 5.8/4.6 and 6.3/6.4.
Part of the story is that the 7900 was banned from pro use in Germany around 2005, as the vibes were considered excessive. I don't know how the story ended....
My comment is that these numbers just is part of the story - how the saws are dampened is a major factor, but impossible to measure. Springs usually work much better than rubber in that regard.
SawTroll
Information Collector
It was only the first ones that weighted like a 70cc saw - that advantage disappeared during the production, and the late ones have been reported to weight pretty much the same as the (on paper much heavier) 7910.
As it is now, the 7910 doesn't have much of a power to weight advantage over the 576xp or MS441, only a tad more of both.
