Thinking of new 60cc class saw

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Ok, sorry its taken me so long to get back with my decision, I have been kinda busy with the new job. So I ended up going with the dolmar. Thought I would take a chance on something that I haven't tried yet.

I have some pics and had it in some wood yesterday, still on the first tank. It likes to die when you let off the throttle after the cut. Hope that goes away, or it will go back to the dealer.


Congrats on your purchase. Seems the others are too caught up in Husq vrs Stihl to see that you chose the "other German" saw. I didnt read the thread... so did you go with the 6400 or the new 6100 saw?
 
When mine gets home, I will weigh it.. :)

With a 16" B & C the 555 is 16 lbs and 13 oz. That's fully dressed with fuel and oil topped off. I doubt the 362C is lighter. As much as I would love to say it is? It seems heavier. That may be false? But mine 20140622_150228.jpg won't be back from Tn for a couple weeks.

View attachment 353464
cant read the scale in pic very well but it reads 17.2 lbs full of fluids
 
I went with the 6100. I will be ordering a wrap handle for it some time here in the near future.

Does anyone know if you can get double dawgs for this thing? I didnt see an outer one in the ipl.

I am amazed at how much fluid this thing holds.
 
I went with the 6100. I will be ordering a wrap handle for it some time here in the near future.

Does anyone know if you can get double dawgs for this thing? I didnt see an outer one in the ipl.

I am amazed at how much fluid this thing holds.
That 6100 is very nice! Im not sure on the dawgs but if it has a place for an outer dawg to bolt on to clutch cover Im sure u can get one
 
metals 406 could make u some dawgs probably if u ask him. Magnum dawgs on a 60cc look good but arent neceasary and will put saw in a bind if u dont pay close attention when cutting. Medium size dawgs like on my 362 in the pic work very good
 
cant read the scale in pic very well but it reads 17.2 lbs full of fluids
154935607.2Ke9XIDe.555image.jpg


Stihl claim their 362CM is 12.8 lbs. Going by Stihl, Dolmar, and Husqvarna's history of quoting weight with no cutting gear, no clutch cover, no clutch drum, no clutch, no piston, with titanium bolts, and helium in the tank, I would be stunned if it actually were 12.8 lbs.
 
w

Stihl claim their 362CM is 12.8 lbs. Going by Stihl, Dolmar, and Husqvarna's history of quoting weight with no cutting gear, no clutch cover, no clutch drum, no clutch, no piston, with titanium bolts, and helium in the tank, I would be stunned if it actually were 12.8 lbs.
Ill weigh it when I get home in a few hrs. I have no idea what it weighs pho. My 362 also has the r kit which includes 3/4 bar,oversize clutch cover, double dawgs and roller and all extra hardware and weighs 17.2 lbs with sugi bar and all fluids. Ill put stock clutch cover on and pour fluids out and take bar off and tell everyone for sure
 
It never is a "fantastic deal" to buy something that you don't want. ;)

What can ya get in Norway for 1,7K NOK? ;)

Having said that, I am impressed with the little Shinnys up to 50cc. Much less so with the bigger ones. At least stock with an MM. Ported, the little shinnies are great. The bigger ones are still a touch heavy compared to alternatives, but they run strong.
 
Ill weigh it when I get home in a few hrs. I have no idea what it weighs pho. My 362 also has the r kit which includes 3/4 bar,oversize clutch cover, double dawgs and roller and all extra hardware and weighs 17.2 lbs with sugi bar and all fluids. Ill put stock clutch cover on and pour fluids out and take bar off and tell everyone for sure

I have the MS361 version of your saw. I may try and weigh it full of fluids with the 20" Sugi, too.

154646885.av4ckJNC.jpg
 
Id like.to know the difference

Well, prolly best to empty out the fluids as well. The problem is finding a scale for me. Maybe I can get a cheap hanging scale... All I know is it is a lot lighter than a 440 with full wrap(by nearly 2lbs), which is why I went with a ported 361 instead(I'm old) - most of the wood we have here for logging is 18"-36" spruce/cedar. A 70cc saw isn't really warranted, and I am always on a hill or mtnside when using it. So, it's come in handy.
 
I have the MS361 version of your saw. I may try and weigh it full of fluids with the 20" Sugi, too.

154646885.av4ckJNC.jpg

The 361 is a much better saw than the newer 362.

It is lighter and neater, with a quad transfer non-strato engine (it is the only Stihl ever to have such an engine). Unlike most Stihl saws, it (at least the Euro version) also has really good trigger response/accelleration.
 
The 361 is a much better saw than the newer 362.

It is lighter and neater, with a quad transfer non-strato engine (it is the only Stihl ever to have such an engine).Unlike most Stihl saws, it (at least the Euro version) also has really good
response/accelleration.[/QUOTE
Ive noticed 0 issues with trigger response or acceleration with my 362c? Not sure where your comin from?
 
I'd like to see it. The main problem I had with the 362(non CM) I tried was it was very sluggish compared to even a stock MS361, let alone my ported one.
Cant compare a 362 with a 362c. My ported 362c isnt far behind my stock 461r in smaller wood. No sluggishness on my 362c. Maybe I just got a good one? I havent heard much good said about a stock 362 non c model
 

Latest posts

Back
Top