And, now back to our regular programing ...
I was at lunch with the family and while they were discussing other matters I let my mind drift a bit (easy enough to do at my age ). It seems that Stihl and Husky may have made a logical decision here? If my thinking is correct, they get double bang for the $$.
They get to sell, or license, older tooling and designs to be built in China. They get to keep selling their products into markets that normally could not afford their name's. They get to keep making spares for their older designs which keeps their reputation for good support of older models w/o the cost of doing it in Germany or Sweden where they need all the floor space and staff for current modern production.
So it looks like a strategic decision and good marketing. The only downside is for us to determine which MFGs are really licensed by the respective actual patent and copy-write owners? For Stihl, my guess is Juli Tool, but it's only a guess so far :msp_sad:
I was at lunch with the family and while they were discussing other matters I let my mind drift a bit (easy enough to do at my age ). It seems that Stihl and Husky may have made a logical decision here? If my thinking is correct, they get double bang for the $$.
They get to sell, or license, older tooling and designs to be built in China. They get to keep selling their products into markets that normally could not afford their name's. They get to keep making spares for their older designs which keeps their reputation for good support of older models w/o the cost of doing it in Germany or Sweden where they need all the floor space and staff for current modern production.
So it looks like a strategic decision and good marketing. The only downside is for us to determine which MFGs are really licensed by the respective actual patent and copy-write owners? For Stihl, my guess is Juli Tool, but it's only a guess so far :msp_sad: